Let's Get Serious

I have now read Palin's Facebook response to the President and regarding Section 1233(by now I expect it needs no further identification) and find her contentions as well as those of the people she quotes as functionally, baseless fear-mongering. "The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context." sayeth Palin. Now, I do not intend to state or infer a position of my own on the subject of abortion but it seems to me that a conservative like Palin would most assuredly argue to the contrary, i.e. that there would be no coercive effect, if the "context" being referred to was a proffered discussion by medical personnel with a young woman of alternatives to a planned abortion.

A person may speculate that any meeting with a government representative in any context may be used for intimidation. A traffic court requiring a senior citizen to retake a driving test following a ticketed offense could surely intimidate the citizen to relinquish the privilege to drive thereby limiting contact with the world outside his home, inducing depression and ultimately suicide which would address social security and medicare shortfalls and reduce unattended flashing turn signals on the roads. Just how many police officers and judges could be convinced to knowingly participate in such atrocities?

The singular coercive effect of a discussion of the matters covered in 1233 would be to have the patient, due to age and/or changed medical condition decide what they wanted to be done in their care. Just how many of these medical professionals could be corrupted to become "Angels of Death" ala Mengele for the good of the country? There are more than enough legitimate issues to address in this and subsequent legislative proposals without this type of political, extreme propaganda.

Palin and the Media (Chapter One)

The attacks on the candidacy of Gov. Palin, both direct and inferential, being presented now in the media are baseless and ridiculous. The question as to whether the mother of young children can handle substantial leadership responsibilities should have long been buried in the sands.

The lead to a New York Times "news report" today reads: "A series of disclosures about Gov. Sarah Palin, Senator John McCain’s choice as running mate, called into question on Monday how thoroughly Mr. McCain had examined her background before putting her on the Republican presidential ticket." The NYT should have more correctly read "This newspaper is calling into question...." since the article describes it's own reporters calling the issue into question.

After referring to the pregnancy of Gov. Palin's daughter, the NYT article immediately continued: "Among other less attention-grabbing news of the day: it was learned that Ms. Palin now has a private lawyer in a legislative ethics investigation in Alaska into whether she abused her power in dismissing the state’s public safety commissioner; that she was a member for two years in the 1990s of the Alaska Independence Party, which has at times sought a vote on whether the state should secede; and that Mr. Palin was arrested 22 years ago on a drunken-driving charge." These items, as presented by the NYT, individually and collectively, are meaningless. Certainly, the underlying issues of the ethics investigation are important and relevant to her qualifications. However, the fact, alone, that she has a lawyer to represent her in the investigation is suggestive of nothing more than her wisdom in seeking an advocate to insure her rights are protected. The NYT presents this as part of a "Law and Order" script where the detective announces "She lawyered -up." and the audience immediately concludes that she is guilty. I don't know the background of the "Independence Party" but it certainly doesn't have the ring of the Communist Party or anarchism. The secession of Alaska, or Hawaii, or Puerto Rico or Staten Island (which have each given it some consideration) is not a prelude to another Civil War though there is no telling what image that same "Law and Order" audience would conjure at the suggestion. Assuming Mr. Palin has matured since his marriage to the Governor and after his other adult accomplishments his arrest (conviction?) 22 years ago should be nothing more than a footnote. Her daughter's pregnancy is simply irrelevant to Gov. Palin's candidacy. Although the media appears to accept this, there are continuing and unnecessary references to the irrelevance thereby keeping the issue before the public as if it mattered. It doesn't.

The manner of the media's presentation of accumulated, insignificant events and conjectures may influence those Americans who read the headlines on the magazines at the checkout counter and walk out of the store wondering whether or not Jennifer Anniston really is a Russian spy. The conjectures are picked up and spun and re-spun on the 24 hour "news" channels with the addition of "analysis" by talking-heads who are vacuous, advocates for one side or the other. And my friends, on both ends, pick up this, so-called, news and analysis and their emails then bolster the truth and importance of nothing.

McCain's choice of Palin

First of all, after the self-centered, morally corrupt years of the Clinton presidency and the corruption of our Constitution and national moral values by the Bush/Cheney cabal, I want to see, in anyone who would lead this Country, strength of character and integrity. That integrity should itself be premised upon a high personal moral code. The strength of character I look for is suggested in the words of the West Point Cadet Prayer: "Make us to choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong, and never to be content with a half truth when the whole truth can be won. Endow us with courage that is born of loyalty to all that is noble and worthy, that scorns to compromise with vice and injustice and knows no fear when truth and right are in jeopardy." I want an American who will defend not just America's shores against attack but also will defend the People's Constitutional and evolved liberties and sustain their pursuit of happiness.

For my adult life I have been a political independent. I grew up in Chicago where the Democratic precinct captain was the link to all political services. On one wall of our rented flat was a crucifix and a picture of FDR. I stood near and listened to JFK speak. I believed in him and believed in "The Impossible Dream" of that man from La Mancha. Later, despite the warning that voting for him would place me in Viet Nam, I voted for Goldwater.

I now understand more about the growth of this country than was presented in the history classes of the fifties and early sixties. I appreciate more the complexities of international policies and national politics. I have repeatedly sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And I believe that whatever value to the United States there may be to "free-trade" and globalization, they are not a substitute for the evolved values of liberty and justice in our country. In other words, it is imperative that our leaders believe that the core of this "experiment" must be protected. There will be change, as in all things. But, the strength, the beauty, the value, the promise of the American experiment has now given way to self-centered consumerism and unbridled capitalism. The rhetoric of politicians espousing "our American values" is, and has been for some time, hypocritical in view of their actions and their inaction's.

I see hypocrisy in the McCain of 2008 as he does himself. I wholly disagree with some of his proposals; continuing the Bush tax cuts, for example. With the editors of The Economist (Aug. 30, 2008), I prefer McCain One. The Republican Party agenda under Cheney/Bush has been an affront to the vast majority of Americans. Yet, I have a confidence in McCain's integrity and strength of character that I just cannot find in Obama. The fluffy rhetoric of the Democratic Party and expansive promises are hollow. I am angry that the opposition party could do no better than Obama after the debacles of Bush. I am willing to trust McCain's judgment as president though I may shudder and say a prayer as to some of his stated policies. His decisions in office will be made, I believe, after honest, intellectual consideration of options for the common good within this country. I am encouraged by his honesty when he answers "I don't know the answer but I'll get back to you" to some off-the-wall question. But, let me get back to the questions surrounding Gov. Sarah Palin.

I am willing to trust McCain's judgment as president on critical international and national issues. I see no reason, at this point, not to trust his judgment on Palin. McCain will define the role and responsibilities he wants from his Vice President just as he will define the policies of the Republican Party for this election. I share the concern of others who question whether the scope and substance of Gov. Palin's life experience has given her the strengths necessary to lead a nation. As I see her in these first few days, I like the fact that she appears to have entered into politics more with a sense of selfless service to her community than political party ambition. I like her "frontier" persona. I like her positions and actions to bring integrity into government and on care for the environment. I like the choice of a strong woman who has shown the ability to lead, to make tough decisions. Her shortcomings in international affairs are the shortcomings of Obama as well. I do not have confidence in Obama's character. Presidents and Vice Presidents have the strengths of intellectual and experienced advisers. The "3:00 o'clock AM" calls are events in evolving situations that have been studied and briefed. The Pentagon, Homeland Defense, the CIA, et al. have contingency studies and plans. The real questions are in the personal character, intelligence, wisdom and decisiveness of the leader. These questions apply equally during the regular work day of the leader.

Gov. Palin should begin with the benefit from us of a trust in McCain's judgment and with a confidence in herself. As for me, I want to believe.